tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21888150.post114854954675406040..comments2023-07-21T22:14:54.925+10:00Comments on CoreEcon: Commentary on economics, strategy and more: The Y2K BubJoshua Ganshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13713171032343855718noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21888150.post-1148628739106100332006-05-26T17:32:00.000+10:002006-05-26T17:32:00.000+10:00Don't you remember? There were a bunch of competi...Don't you remember? There were a bunch of competitions for first baby. That's why.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21888150.post-1148621897777335812006-05-26T15:38:00.000+10:002006-05-26T15:38:00.000+10:00Link seems to be broken on the paper.Link seems to be broken on the paper.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21888150.post-1148604251142832942006-05-26T10:44:00.000+10:002006-05-26T10:44:00.000+10:00Obviously the wrong date (now changed). On that ot...Obviously the wrong date (now changed). On that other date, we are most definitely on to that. Stay tuned.Joshua Ganshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13713171032343855718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21888150.post-1148601280003333602006-05-26T09:54:00.000+10:002006-05-26T09:54:00.000+10:00" If we look 9 months ahead to September 2006,"Cry..." If we look 9 months ahead to September 2006,"<BR/><BR/>Crystal Ball gazing or the wrong date?<BR/><BR/>Surely the most interesting date to test would be the 1st July 2004. How many people held off havng bubs until after the $3k maternity payment (Caesareans and induced labours). <BR/><BR/>Also, going forward have people tried to plan bubs to get over the comming $1k increase in maternity Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com